Article initially published in The Lancet on April 30, 2020 as part of the Issue 10236 in volume 395 (published on May 16, 2020) and written by Nigel Curtis, Annie Sparrow, Tedros A Ghebreyesus, Mihai G Netea
In addition to its specific effect against tuberculosis, the BCG vaccine has beneficial nonspecific (off-target) effects on the immune system that protect against a wide range of other infections and are used routinely to treat bladder cancer.1, 2 This has led to the suggestion that vaccination with BCG might have a role in protecting health-care workers and other vulnerable individuals against severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Randomised controlled trials have provided evidence that the BCG vaccine’s immunomodulatory properties can protect against respiratory infections. In Guinea-Bissau, a high-mortality setting, BCG-Danish reduced all-cause neonatal mortality by 38% (95% CI 17–54), mainly because there were fewer deaths from pneumonia and sepsis.3 In South Africa, BCG-Danish reduced respiratory tract infections by 73% (95% CI 39–88) in adolescents.4
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a single-stranded positive-sense RNA virus, and the BCG vaccine has been shown to reduce the severity of infections by other viruses with that structure in controlled trials. For example, the BCG vaccine reduced yellow fever vaccine viraemia by 71% (95% CI 6–91) in volunteers in the Netherlands,5 and it markedly reduced the severity of mengovirus (encephalomyocarditis virus) infection in two studies in mice.6, 7
Many of the mechanisms underlying the beneficial off-target effects of the BCG vaccine are now understood. The BCG vaccine and some other live vaccines induce metabolic and epigenetic changes that enhance the innate immune response to subsequent infections, a process termed trained immunity.8 The BCG vaccine might therefore reduce viraemia after SARS-COV-2 exposure, with consequent less severe COVID-19 and more rapid recovery.
Randomised controlled trials are underway in the Netherlands and Australia to assess whether BCG-Danish reduces the incidence and severity of COVID-19 in health-care workers, and the effect this has on time away from work (NCT04327206, NCT04328441). It is possible that BCG-Tokyo would be preferable to BCG-Danish.9
Until these trials are complete, there are four main reasons why it is very important to adhere to WHO’s recommendation that the BCG vaccine is used for COVID-19 only in randomised controlled trials.10
First, the BCG vaccine is already in short supply, and indiscriminate use could jeopardise the supply needed to protect children against tuberculosis in high-risk areas. Second, whether BCG will be effective remains unknown: findings from the ecological studies suggesting less COVID-19 in countries with routine BCG immunisation are weak evidence because they are based on population rather than individual data and are prone to confounding.11
Also, it is unlikely that a BCG vaccine given decades ago in childhood will ameliorate COVID-19 now. One reason for this is that the beneficial off-target effects of the BCG vaccine might be altered by subsequent administration of a different vaccine.1
Third, if the BCG vaccine is not effective against COVID-19, BCG vaccination could engender a false sense of security. Fourth, careful safety monitoring in randomised trials is needed to guard against the remote possibility that up-regulation of immunity by BCG will exacerbate COVID-19 in a minority of patients with severe disease.
If the BCG vaccine or another inducer of trained immunity provides non-specific protection to bridge the gap before a disease-specific vaccine is developed, this would be an important tool in the response to COVID-19 and future pandemics.
NC is the lead investigator of the BRACE trial (NCT04327206), and MGN is one of the lead investigators of the BCG-CORONA trial (NCT04328441). TAG is Director General of WHO. AS declares no competing interests.
References
- 1.
- Pollard AJ
- Finn A
- Curtis N
- 2.
- Goodridge HS
- Ahmed SS
- Curtis N
- et al.
- 3.
- Biering-Sorensen S
- Aaby P
- Lund N
- et al.
- 4.
- Nemes E
- Geldenhuys H
- Rozot V
- et al.
- 5.
- Arts RJW
- Moorlag S
- Novakovic B
- et al.
- 6.
- Old LJ
- Benacerraf B
- Clarke DA
- Carswell EA
- Stockert E
- 7.
- Floc’h F
- Werner GH
- 8.
- Netea MG
- Dominguez-Andres J
- Barreiro LB
- et al.
- 9.
- Ritz N
- Hanekom WA
- Robins-Browne R
- Britton WJ
- Curtis N
- 10.
- WHO
- 11.
- Faust L
- Huddart S
- MacLean E
- Svadzian A
Article Info
Publication History
Published: April 30, 2020
Identification
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31025-4
Copyright
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirect
Read full article on thelancet.com
Recent Comments